We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.
Kari J., Bergelson M.
Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, 2024.
Vinogradov A., Korobov M.
Indogermanischen Forschungen. 2025. Vol. 130. No. 1. P. 7-28.
Kazartsev (Evgenii Kazartcev) E., Dmitry Pronin, Kirina M.
In bk.: 37th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT. IEEE, 2025.
Kuznetsov Egor.
Linguistics. WP BRP. НИУ ВШЭ, 2023. No. 113.
Abstract:
In a closely related set of languages such as that of the Slavic genus, differences in the use of derivational morphology are difficult to analyze because of the multitude of functions and factors which are rarely clear cut. The talk presents a method to investigate divergence and convergence in the use of derivational morphology on the basis of translationally equivalent texts. This investigation is part of a more general system which allows for the simple investigation of many, heterogenous linguistic variables.
Using a word aligned, morphologically tagged and lemmatized parallel corpus of prose in all major Slavic languages (ParaSol), I compare the use of nominal suffixes and verbal prefixes in translationally equivalent verb forms across languages. This gives me an extensionally defined handle on the domain of use for each derivational type and makes a comparison of interlanguage differences as well as differences between types possible. The data are evaluated both using clustering algorithms as well as qualitatively using a web interface that visualizes the contrasting prefixed forms in context.